CiteJury

Check it before you post it on LinkedIn.

AI makes things up. CiteJury catches it.

Paste the claim or the AI answer. CiteJury finds real sources, seals them into a pack, and has three AIs read the same pack and answer on their own. Every line of the verdict links to its source.

Free to start: 50 credits with a work email, 30 with a personal one. A standard check is about 5 credits. If a check fails, you don't pay.

Checked by Claude ChatGPT Grok Gemini on Deep

Recorded checks, replayed as they ran. Read the full write-up →

  1. 1Paste a claimA sentence, an AI answer, or a whole file.
  2. 2Sources are sealed, then 3 AIs read themClaude, ChatGPT and Grok read the same pack. Nothing can be added later.
  3. 3See the verdictTrue or not, why, a safe way to say it, and links to the proof.

Three real checks.
Open any of them.

Each verdict below came from a recorded run: real sources, real votes, nothing staged. Run one yourself to read every source and every juror's answer.

Why not just ask one AI?
It can sound sure and still be wrong.

CiteJury finds real sources first. Then three AIs read them and answer on their own. You see where they agree.

One AI, from memory
A chatbot answerSounds sure, but shows no proof.
CiteJury · Same sources for every AI
CiteJury Three AIs check the same sealed sources. You get one clear answer, with proof for every line.
One AI, with web search
A chatbot that searchesFinds a page, but nobody checks that the quote is right.
Three AIs, three separate chats
Asking each chatbot yourselfThree different answers, and you have to sort them out.

Real mistakes
CiteJury caught.

The hardest mistakes to spot are the ones that are almost right. Each one here came from a real check.

One word was wrong

“refunded the full A$440,000 fee”

→a partial refund, the final instalment

AI answer about DeloitteAll 3 AIs agreed · about 3 minutes
Wrong number

“settled with the EPA for around $3M”

→a $900,000 penalty plus up to $23M in fixes

Slide deck, slide 5All 3 AIs agreed
Got it backwards

“oil spill negligence that led to a fire”

→a fire ruptured hoses and spilled oil

Slide deck, slide 5Marked Incorrect
A part, not the whole

“Blue Harvest acquired High Liner Foods”

→it bought High Liner's scallop business

Slide deck, slide 6Marked Incorrect

Four verdicts.
No guessing.

Claude, ChatGPT and Grok each vote on their own. A final review checks that every quote they used is really in its source. Only then do you see the result.

See every step on a real check →
✓ CorrectEvery part is backed by sources.
✕ IncorrectAt least one part is wrong, even a single number.
⇄ Sources disagreeGood sources say different things. You see both.
? Can't confirmThere isn't enough proof, so we don't guess.

Every answer comes with proof
you can open and read.

We look at trusted places first, like government websites, official records, big news agencies and science journals. Here are some of them.

Ttheguardian.comAapnews.comRreuters.comAafr.comAabc.net.auBbbc.co.ukFft.comBbloomberg.comNnytimes.comPprnewswire.comSseafoodsource.comNnine.com.auTtheguardian.comAapnews.comRreuters.comAafr.comAabc.net.auBbbc.co.ukFft.comBbloomberg.comNnytimes.comPprnewswire.comSseafoodsource.comNnine.com.au
Ssec.govEepa.govAakleg.govEecology.wa.govUusda.govFfda.govGgov.ukEeuropa.euFfederalregister.govCcensus.govBbls.govOons.gov.ukSsec.govEepa.govAakleg.govEecology.wa.govUusda.govFfda.govGgov.ukEeuropa.euFfederalregister.govCcensus.govBbls.govOons.gov.uk
Mmcgovern.mit.eduHhub.jhu.eduPpsychologicalscience.orgNnature.comPpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govAarxiv.orgWwho.intOoecd.orgWworldbank.orgIimf.orgNnasa.govBbritannica.comMmcgovern.mit.eduHhub.jhu.eduPpsychologicalscience.orgNnature.comPpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govAarxiv.orgWwho.intOoecd.orgWworldbank.orgIimf.orgNnasa.govBbritannica.com

Who uses CiteJury?

01Newsrooms

Journalists check a fact before the story goes out.

Paste the line. In about three minutes, three AIs tell you if it's right, and give you a safe way to say it.

How newsrooms use it →
Check a claim/StandardDone in just over 3 min

“Deloitte refunded the full A$440,000 fee to the Australian government over its AI-error report.”

✕IncorrectAll 3 AIs agree · 3 of 4 parts held

The story is real, but the refund was partial, not the full fee.

Safe way to say it

Deloitte agreed to a partial refund, the final instalment of its A$440,000 contract, not a repayment of the full fee.

Claude✕Incorrect
ChatGPT✕Incorrect
Grok✕Incorrect
GeminiJoins on Deep

02Decks and reports

Analysts check every claim in a slide deck.

Upload a PowerPoint and pick up to 25 claims. Each one comes back marked, with a fix you can paste.

See the full report on this deck →
Claim on slide 5/StandardUSDA Risk Assessment Sprint.pptx

“Trident settled with the EPA for around $3M under the Clean Air Act.”

✕IncorrectClaude, ChatGPT and Grok all said Incorrect

Wrong amount: a $900,000 penalty plus up to $23M in fixes, not about $3M.

Suggested fix

Trident settled Clean Air Act claims with the EPA, paying a $900,000 penalty and agreeing to spend up to $23 million on refrigerant fixes.

Claude✕Incorrect
ChatGPT✕Incorrect
Grok✕Incorrect
GeminiJoins on Deep

03Supplier risk

Buying teams check what a supplier says about itself.

Deep checks search wider and add Gemini as a fourth AI. Good for niche, legal or very new topics.

Supplier checks →
Claim on slide 7/DeepDone in about 4 min

“OBI Seafoods was formed by merging Ocean Beauty Seafoods and Icicle Seafoods' Alaska operations.”

✓CorrectClaude, Grok and Gemini agree · 28 sources sealed

OBI was formed in 2020 from the two companies' Alaska salmon and groundfish units.

Claude✓Correct
ChatGPT-No answer
Grok✓Correct
Gemini✓Correct

04Essays and research

Students catch myths before they go in the essay.

A standard check costs about 50¢ and takes a minute or two. Every line of the answer links to a source.

For students and researchers →
Check a claim/StandardDone in 86 seconds

“Humans only use 10% of their brains.”

✕IncorrectClaude, ChatGPT and Grok agree

It's a myth. Neuroscience sources say the whole brain is used.

Safe way to say it

Imaging shows the whole brain is active, though not every region is busy at the same moment.

Claude✕Incorrect
ChatGPT✕Incorrect
Grok✕Incorrect
GeminiJoins on Deep

Pay for what a check uses.

Buy credits in packs. They never expire. A standard check costs about 5 credits ($0.50). Work emails start with 50 free credits, personal ones with 30.

Small

$10 + tax where applicable

100 credits

About 20 standard checks

Get started

Pro

$50 to $2,500 + tax where applicable

500 to 25,000 credits

Choose the amount you need. Same price per credit.

Get started

Prices are in USD. In the EU, the UK, Norway, Iceland, Switzerland, Australia and New Zealand they include VAT or GST; elsewhere any sales tax is added at checkout.

Typical cost

Reading a documentThen each claim you pick is one checkabout 1 credit
Quick1 AI, no final reviewabout 2 credits
StandardClaude, ChatGPT and Grok, plus a final review. Claude and ChatGPT also search the webabout 5 credits
DeepWidest search. Gemini joins as a fourth AI, and Claude, ChatGPT and Grok also search the webabout 10 credits
Company searchStandard, reads many company pagesabout 30 credits
Follow-up questionAnswered from the same sourcesabout 1 credit
  • You only pay what a check actually uses
  • Failed checks are free
  • Reopening and downloading are free
  • Credits never expire
  • We don't keep your files

Your files
stay private.

We read your file, then delete it right away.

The text from your file is deleted once your claims are checked.

We don't use your content to train AI.

How we handle your data →

Good
questions.

How is this different from asking ChatGPT?+

ChatGPT is one AI giving one answer. CiteJury first finds real, dated sources. Then it gives the same sources to three AIs (four on Deep) and checks every quote they use. You see where they agree, where they don't, and why.

What if the sources don't settle it?+

You get Can't confirm, not a guess. If good sources say different things, you get Sources disagree and see both sides.

What happens to documents I upload?+

We read the file and delete it right away. The text from it is deleted once your claims are checked. We keep only each claim, the words it came from, its result and its sources.

Which AIs do you use?+

Claude, ChatGPT and Grok each read the same sources and answer on their own. A final review then writes the result. Deep checks add Gemini as a fourth AI. A small helper model called Jev (from TypeSafe) removes off-topic sources first. It never decides the result.

Can CiteJury be wrong?+

Yes. A result is only as good as its sources, so every line links to one. Open them before you rely on it. If something looks wrong, use Report a problem on the result page.

Do I get free credits?+

Yes. Sign up with a work email and you get 50 free credits, enough for about 9 checks. Personal emails like Gmail or Outlook get 30. No card needed.

Show all questions

Check the facts before you post, publish or hit send.

Free to start: 50 credits with a work email, 30 with a personal one. If a check fails, you don't pay.

or upload a PDF, Word or PowerPoint file